Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01001
Original file (BC 2009 01001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01001 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be awarded decorations recognizing his service in Vietnam. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While assigned at Clark AB, Philippines, he went on temporary 
duty (TDY) tours to various bases throughout Vietnam and 
believes he qualifies for the requested decorations. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal 
statement. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s master personnel record (MPR) was misplaced before 
an advisory was prepared. All efforts to date to locate the 
missing record have been unsuccessful. 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in 
the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at 
Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, noting, in part, based on the 
available evidence, they were not able to confirm the applicant 
served in Vietnam. They requested the applicant provide 
additional information to show proof that he served in Vietnam; 
however, in his response he did not submit any additional 
information. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant explained the circumstances as to why he was not 
able to provide additional evidence to support his appeal. 
While he realizes now, the importance of recordkeeping; he does 
not have the required documentation, since it’s been over 
40 years. 

 

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Should the applicant 
provide additional documentation to substantiate his claim, we 
would be inclined to reconsider his petition. In view of the 
above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-01001 in Executive Session on 29 April 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-01001 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 09, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 12 Mar 10. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Mar 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01001

    Original file (BC-2009-01001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, noting, in part, based on the available evidence, they were not able to confirm the applicant served in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02499

    Original file (BC-2009-02499.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02499 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and other unit medals for the time he served in Vietnam. VSM Criterion: The VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00021

    Original file (BC 2009 00021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the AM, CRM, and VSM. The CRM is awarded to U.S. Air Force, U.S. Air Force Reserve service members, and service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02214

    Original file (BC-2010-02214.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Information regarding his service with the 1964th Communications Group in the Republic of Vietnam has been declassified since the time of his discharge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s request for credit for service in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01548

    Original file (BC-2010-01548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The DPSIDR complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 29 Oct 10 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04218

    Original file (BC-2010-04218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04218 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the following: 1. Credited for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01007

    Original file (BC-2013-01007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The VSM, VCM, and his service time in the Republic of Vietnam are not reflected in his records. The amount of Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct, therefore, a correction is not needed. The Board notes the Air Force office of primary responsibility confirms the applicant was TDY to the Republic of Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01429

    Original file (BC-2012-01429.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01429 in Executive Session on 30 Aug...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00307

    Original file (BC-2009-00307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) be replaced with the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). DPAPP states a thorough review of the applicant's master personnel records failed to provide any document that substantiated any time served in Vietnam. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01086

    Original file (BC-2011-01086.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 April 2011, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that they were unable to verify his service in the Republic of Vietnam and requested any personal records that affirmed his service there; i.e., travel vouchers, evaluation reports, letters of evaluation, decorations, or any other official military documents that reflected service in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...